

It even can't stop opening a new tab for every image and not closing it when returning to the browser.Ībandoning the Classic is not a good decision.

I haven't seen any advantages but found some disadvantages. Below it, select the method/algorithm to use. You can add images using the Add files button, or folders containing the images using the Add folder button. That should open a small window to add the files to compare. You can reimplement WHOLE program on Qt and can't implement SOME features in existing app? Open XnViewMP and in the toolbar select Tools then Search similar files or Find similar files in the classic version. The basic difference between the two is that the new version is compatible with multiple platforms, including Windows, Mac OS, and Linux, rather than the old. Why "the features" can't be developed in Classic? Another major advantage of MP is it's native support for Unicode. Was it necessary to change something that was working well? I don't like folders hanging in the space.įeatures? Claiming that MP supports "500" formats means that Classic support less? How much? I haven't seen. While the Classic edition is only available as a 32-bit application, MP 64-bit is able to benefit from the advantages of modern hardware and operating systems, resulting in increased perfomance (64-bit computing). Has this type of tree-view any advantages? Probably "windows 10" explorer hasn't these "lines", but has "windows 10" any advantages? Not a native tree-view without lines like normal explorer in windows 7. Qt? What is the advantage? It's a huge "framework" and can't work faster.
#Compare xnview and xnview mp software
Ev'ry developer praise their "new" software and claims that it is more convenient but what if actually for users it's the old version?Ĭross-platform? I'm on Windows.
